Prakhar Singh Jat
JSLH O.P. Jindal Global University
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v8-i03-02Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:
Finding a fair balance between present needs and the rights of future generations is a fundamental ethical challenge caused by the increasing threat of climate change. Titled "A Sustainable Legacy: Navigating Climate Change Through the Lens of Intergenerational Justice," this paper delves into the complex connection between climate action and intergenerational justice, drawing attention to the moral duty of present-day societies to protect the social and environmental conditions that future generations will need to thrive. This paper offers a critical examination of the responsibilities of current generations in reducing climate risks and ensuring sustainability for future generations. It draws on ethical frameworks such as John Rawls' theory of justice, the capabilities approach by Amartya Sen and the precautionary principle. This approach revolves around the idea of intergenerational justice, which states that we have an ethical obligation to ensure that future generations have access to healthy ecosystems, abundant natural resources, and a predictable climate. Using arguments from deontological and consequentialist theory, the article contends that the right to life, health, and wellbeing of future humans will be violated if we do nothing to combat climate change. Applying Rawls' "veil of ignorance," the study shows that decision-makers would prioritize long-term environmental sustainability without knowing which generation they belong to, therefore promoting a fair allocation of risks and resources across time. Furthermore, the capacities approach lends credence to the moral imperative to combat climate change by stressing the importance of preserving fundamental human rights and opportunities, which are in grave danger from the effects of climate change. In addition, the report takes into account the precautionary principle, which states that strong climate measures should be implemented regardless of the level of scientific confidence, because failing to do so could result in permanent damage to generations to come. An everlasting dedication to sustainability as a foundation of justice is highlighted by this confluence of ethical theory and environmental governance. Modern climate policy, global accords such as the Paris Accord, and the inadequacy of present economic systems in addressing environmental consequences over the long run are all examined in the article. It argues that political and economic systems are too focused on the here and now to think about the planet's long-term viability. By combining policy analysis with ethical discourse, the study urges national and international governing bodies to recast climate change as a justice concern, with obligations that go beyond generations. Finally, this study concludes that if we want to leave a lasting legacy, we must tackle climate change from an ethical perspective of intergenerational justice. In order to leave the earth habitable for generations to come, it says that our generation must put aside its narrow interests and enact comprehensive policies. In order to take ethical climate action, the report recommends rethinking society values with an eye on intergenerational equality and moving towards sustainable development and long-term climate governance.
KEYWORDS:Intergenerational justice, Climate change ethics, Sustainable development,Environmental sustainability, Climate governance
REFERENCES1) Armstrong, H. E. (2015). The Paris Observatory. Nature, 127(3207), 600–601. https://doi.org/10.1038/127600a0
2) Attfield, R. (2015). The ethics of the global environment: 2nd Edition. The Ethics of the Global Environment: 2nd Edition, 5, 1–272.
3) Broome, J. (2012). Climate matters: ethics in a warming world.
4) Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our Common Future (‘The Brundtland Report’): World Commission on Environment and Development. The Top 50 Sustainability Books, 52–55. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351279086-15
5) Caney, S. (2005). Cosmopolitan Justice, Responsibility, and Global Climate Change. Leiden Journal of International Law, 18(4), 747–775. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0922156505002992
6) Caney, S. (2010). Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13(1), 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230903326331
7) Cassam, Q. (2023). Conspiracy Theories. Society, 60(2), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-023-00816-1
8) Cook, G. D., Meyer, C. P. M., Muepu, M., & Liedloff, A. C. (2016). Dead organic matter and the dynamics of carbon and greenhouse gas emissions in frequently burnt savannas. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 25(12), 1252–1263. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF15218
9) Crocker, D. A., & Robeyns, I. (2009). Capability and Agency. In C. W. E. Morris (Ed.), Amartya Sen (pp. 60–90). Cambridge University Press.
10) Francis, P. (2019). Laudato Si’: On Care for Our Common Home. Ideals and Ideologies: A Reader, Eleventh Edition, 503–510. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429286827-79
11) Gardiner, S. M. (2006). Protecting future generations: Intergenerational buck-passing, theoretical ineptitude and a brief for a global core precautionary principle. In T. and C. In Jörg (Ed.), Handbook of Intergenerational Justice. Edward Elgar Publishing.
12) Gardiner, S. M. (2011). A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195379440.001.0001
13) Giddens, A. (2011). Introduction to Sociology. In Psychosocial Foundation of Nursing. a. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/11375_23
14) Hickman, C. (2020). We need to (find a way to) talk about … Eco-anxiety. Journal of Social Work Practice, 34(4), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2020.1844166
15) IPCC. (2014). Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. (Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability., 1132. https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg2/WGIIAR5-FrontMatterA_FINAL.pdf
16) IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change. Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926
17) Jamieson, D. (2014). Reason in a Dark Time: Why the Struggle Against Climate Change Failed -- and What It Means for Our Future. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199337668.001.0001
18) Jasanoff, S. (2010). A new climate for society. Theory, Culture and Society, 27(2), 233–253. a. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409361497
19) Jenkins, W., Tucker, M. E., & Grim, J. (2017). Routledge Handbook of Religion and Ecology. Routledge. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=LVjWoAEACAAJ
20) Midtgaard, S. F. (2012). On Thomas Pogge’s theory of global justice: Why we are not collectively responsible for the global distribution of benefits and burdens between individuals. Sats, 13(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1515/sats-2012-0012
21) Moffat, R. (2010). The Stern Review. In Medico-Legal Journal (Vol. 78, Issue 4). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1258/mlj.2010.010026
22) Norton, B. G. (2024). “Environmental Values”: An Appreciation. Environmental Values, 17(2), 303–306. a. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30302643
23) Salahuddin, A. (2018). Robert Nozick’s Entitlement Theory of Justice, Libertarian Rights and the Minimal State: A Critical Evaluation. Journal of Civil & Legal Sciences, 07. https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-0170.1000234
24) Shue, H. (2014). Climate Justice: Vulnerability and Protection. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:153127382
25) Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G. K., Tignor, M. M. B., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., & Midgley, P. M. (2013). Climate change 2013 the physical science basis: Working Group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Climate Change 2013 the Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 9781107057, 1–1535. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324
26) Thompson, J. (2011). A Theory of Intergenerational Justice. In Environmental Ethics (Vol. 33, Issue 3, pp. 321–322). a. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201133334
27) Watson, K. (1992). The Social Discount Rate. In P. / F. In: Laslett James S. (eds. (Ed.), Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation (Vol. 7, Issue 1). Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.07.007
28) Weiss, E. B. (2021). The Theoretical Framework for International Legal Principles of Intergenerational Equity and Implementation through National Institutions. In M.-C. Cordonier Segger, M. Szabó, & A. R. Harrington (Eds.), Intergenerational Justice in Sustainable Development Treaty Implementation: Advancing Future Generations Rights through National Institutions (pp. 16–44). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/9781108768511.003
29) Whyte, K. (2017). Indigenous climate change studies: Indigenizing futures, decolonizing the anthropocene. English Language Notes, 55(1–2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1215/00138282-55.1-2.153
30) Young, M. A. (2011). Climate Change Law and Regime Interaction. Carbon & Climate Law Review, 5(2), 147–157. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24324028
Volume 08 Issue 03 March 2025
There is an Open Access article, distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Our Services and Policies
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected.
The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis will publish 12 monthly online issues per year,IJMRA publishes articles as soon as the final copy-edited version is approved. IJMRA publishes articles and review papers of all subjects area.
Open access is a mechanism by which research outputs are distributed online, Hybrid open access journals, contain a mixture of open access articles and closed access articles.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis initiate a call for research paper for Volume 08 Issue 04 (April 2025).
PUBLICATION DATES:
1) Last Date of Submission : 26 April 2025.
2) Article published within a week.
3) Submit Article : editor@ijmra.in or Online
Why with us
1 : IJMRA only accepts original and high quality research and technical papers.
2 : Paper will publish immediately in current issue after registration.
3 : Authors can download their full papers at any time with digital certificate.
The Editors reserve the right to reject papers without sending them out for review.
Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not conform to the format and style of the Journal may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected. The Journal reserves the right to make any further formal changes and language corrections necessary in a manuscript accepted for publication so that it conforms to the formatting requirements of the Journal.